“The denial rate looks fine. So why is cash down?”
Revenue cycle is measured in aggregate and lost in specifics — a payer, a reason code, a queue. Reading it end to end rather than by sample finds the concentrations that averages hide.
revenue cycle
denials
reason code
underpayment
charge master
credentialing
case mix
preference items
Your words, not ours.
Where it concentrates here
Five places the money tends to
go in healthcare. Each one is concentrated — a single agreement, a single queue,
a single account nobody reviews — which is why sampling walks straight past them.
Denials by reason code and payer showing one or two causes carrying most of the value, with no owner assigned to either.
Denied claims never reworked at all, because the queue exceeded the team's capacity and the oldest simply aged out.
Contracted rate against paid rate never systematically compared, so underpayment is invisible unless a payer volunteers it.
Credentialing and enrollment adding weeks between a clinician's start date and their first billable encounter.
Preference-item supply variation between clinicians doing the same procedure, with no clinical difference in outcome.
Not every healthcare is the same business
Multi-site physician groupsPayer contracts negotiated per location or inherited through acquisition, so the same CPT code is reimbursed differently across the group.
Epic in the larger groups; athenahealth, eClinicalWorks or NextGen in the mid-market; Modernizing Medicine in specialty practices
Waystar, Availity or Change Healthcare sitting between the practice and the payer
A separate credentialling tracker, very often a spreadsheet
Dentrix or Open Dental in dental groups, per location and rarely consolidated
Named because it changes what the intake asks for. An extract from one of these has known gaps, and the review is built around them rather than surprised by them.
Reported in your numbers, not ours
days in AR
denial rate
net collection rate
RVU per provider
no-show rate
payer mix
cost per encounter
chair or room utilization
The obligations that set the deadlines
Payer credentialling and revalidation per provider per payer — lapse and the claims deny
Medicare cost reports and Medicaid cost settlement where applicable
HIPAA security risk analysis, which is required annually and often is not done
Stark and Anti-Kickback exposure on any physician compensation formula
340B compliance where the group participates
What the review would ask you for
9 requests written for healthcare
and asked of nobody else — 4 of them core. They sit alongside
the operating spine every business has — finance, revenue, receivables,
payables, contracts, people, IT, operations, risk, commercial and governance
— which is 107 further requests.
Claims detail CoreLine level for the period. De-identified wherever possible — read the personal data note before uploading anything patient-identifiable.
Denials by reason code, payer and month Core
Payer contracts and fee schedules CoreIncluding escalators, effective dates and termination notice.
Contracted rate versus paidIf variance is tracked.
Coding and clinical documentationWho codes, audit results, any coding vendor and their contract.
Charge description masterCurrent, with last review date.
Provider credentialing and enrollment CoreTime from application to first billable encounter, and where it waits.
Utilization and case mixBy service line and site.
Clinical supply and implant spendWith preference-item variation by clinician.
Anything you do not have can be skipped in one
click, with a reason. The intake is completed in the
client portal, which saves each answer as it is given and can be
returned to as often as you like.
When this stops being interesting and becomes urgent
A private equity approach or a DSO/MSO roll-up
A payer contract coming up for renegotiation without a rate analysis to argue from
A denial rate that moved and nobody can say why
An acquisition where the acquired site's economics turn out to be different
A HIPAA risk analysis requested by a payer, a lender or a buyer
Who this involves
Signs it: Practice administrator or CEO; the managing physician on clinical scope
Resists it: Physician owners whose compensation formula the review will decompose
Has been asking for it: The revenue cycle lead, who can already name the problem sites
Who commissions it
CFOs, revenue cycle directors and COOs. Phase one is priced before phase two is
discussed, the report is yours either way, and we take no vendor commissions or referral
fees on anything we recommend.
The proposal sets out the sequence week by
week, what we would need from you, and what it costs for your number of operating
units. No call required to see the number.
Closest to this
Operations that share more with healthcare than the sector label
suggests.